No. 21-7280
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review court-of-special-appeals criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-sufficiency jail-call-evidence standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence
Latest Conference:
2022-04-14
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) Did the Gourt of Special Appeals of Maryland err,in ruling that the evidence
adduced at trial was sufficient to sustain a conviction?
2) Did the Gourt of Special Appeals of Maryland err in ruling the admittance of
contents of two different jail calls the Appellant had following his arrest was
proper?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland err in ruling that the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to sustain a conviction?
Docket Entries
2022-04-18
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-16
Waiver of right of respondent Maryland to respond filed.
2022-02-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 4, 2022)
Attorneys
Maryland
Carrie J. Williams — Respondent
Sammie Carroll
Sammie Carroll — Petitioner