a. WHERE A DISTRICT ATTORNEY FAILS TO EXERCISE DISCRETION IN THE DECISION NOT TO PROSECUTE, CAN CONTINUED AND MOUNTING EVIDENCE BE PRESENTED TO THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND SUBSEQUENT COURTS OF REVIEW TO ILLUSTRATE THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY WAY IN FACT INCORRECT?

b. CAN A STATE COURT SYSTEM OBFISCATE ITS POWER THROUGH CASE LAW TO SUCH AN EXTENT THAT THE JUDICIARY ITSELF FAILS TO UPHOLD ITS OWN POWER WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE SEPARATION OF POWERS DOCTRINE?

Where a district attorney fails to exercise discretion in the decision not to prosecute, can continued and mounting evidence be presented to the district attorney and subsequent courts of review to illustrate that the district attorney was in fact incorrect?