Did the lower court's incorrectly apply Christopher v. Harbury in its attempt justify the dismissal of Petitioner's Active Interference claims? Does Harbury have any relevance to cases seeking prospective relief only?

Did the lower courts improperly apply Lewis v. Casey to Petitioner's claims in the same manner?

Should the district court have ruled on the challenges as to the constitutionality of state regulations that appeared to run contrary to applicable Federal judicial decisions?

Did the Court of Appeals overlook procedural due process errors including but not limited to having combined an appealable dismissal Order with a non-appealable screening Order?

Despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, did the Court of Appeals decision to uphold the district court's determinations..., amount to an unjust legal error requiring Reversal?

Did the Court of Appeals improperly apply Hebbe v. Pliler's plausibility standard for the first time on appeal?

Did the Court of Appeals' minute Memorandum affirming the lower court's dismissal of Petitioner's Appeal, adequately address all of the claims in appellant's comprehensive Opening Brief?

Would it be safe to say that actively and continuously erecting barriers for the sole purpose of interference with a prisoner's right of physical access to prison Law Library..., constitutes an injury per se? And does this type of deprivation become a matter involving the impairment of personal liberty?

If there were actual pleadings deficiencies that rendered the complaint implausible, could that be easily attributable to being arbitrarily denied physical law library access during critical periods of time?

Based upon the current three-circuit consensus, should the well-reasoned active interference doctrine become a constitutionally recognized exception to the holding in Lewis v. Casey?

Did the lower court incorrectly apply Christopher-v-Harbury