No. 21-724
New York University v. Dr. Alan Sacerdote, et al.
Relisted (2)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: class-action class-shares employee-retirement-plans erisa fiduciary-duty mutual-funds prudence retirement-plans
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA
Arbitration ERISA
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the bare allegation that New York University ("NYU") offered retail-class shares of certain mutual funds rather than lower-cost institutional-class shares of the same mutual funds in its employee retirement plans states a claim that NYU breached its fiduciary duty of prudence under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §1104(a)(1)(B).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the bare allegation that New York University offered retail-class shares of certain mutual funds rather than lower-cost institutional-class shares states a claim that NYU breached its fiduciary duty of prudence
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-27
Supplemental brief of respondents Dr. Alan Sacerdote, et al. filed.
2021-12-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-28
Reply of petitioner New York University filed. (Distributed)
2021-12-15
Brief of respondents Dr. Alan Sacerdote, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-11-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 16, 2021)
Attorneys
Dr. Alan Sacerdote, et al.
Jerome J. Schlichter — Schlichter, Bogard & Denton, LLP, Respondent
New York University
Seth P. Waxman — Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Petitioner