I. For more thn 180 pours this court hs held that the priv Juisicition o 4h0 cquistie ro discretionary; it is a mundatory limitation on a courts jurisdiction the procedures requrding the doctrine are

If The quostion prosented is: In Ponir 9 ficyd pcutn SuCceSSIVE the Jurisdiction doctrine a applesto durisdiction over persons and cases. Hs uvr r broadening the application writ of habeas corpus the an "acloptio" poses llowingy "/" as the subversion tho priol docte andulsovereity octi exclusivs Juriscition ain th aa eio o crims or hohe r ad popete e of the . T fu of any commitments made to him by the court, presector, valus c (cdin On Muny Cusys the n dofose counsels rofusal or deliction regarding te fulont of matre thind plpi.

The qurestion pesented is: Although it is wel sottd that defendant's havpthe rio as of right, which inclues the right to conulfatn investiqutio, andan bgtion to advucate the dofnents des subst oneonteneu Caust perfom delicenly whe hh refusts to aduucntt 21f defadants caust which wüs the fulilliment of the promist to appel the consiutionu o th segtinventry starch ofhis vhic, which wasthe conssn in exchane fo his quit onsistot withthe Ftk mndnts of fudametahl cortest?

Whether the Exclusive Jurisdiction Doctrine applies to criminal cases