I. Whether a pre-FSA (First Step Act) defendant's circumstances, changed
by Congress's clarification of §924(c), and the resultant disparity
thereof, alone or in combination with other factors, may,constitute
extraordinary and compelling reasons for compassionate release/reduc
tion of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3582 (c)(1)(A)(i)?

II. Whether a federal court of appeals' failure to stay and/or recall
it's mandate for reconsideration amounts to a miscarriage of justice,
when a subsequent decision of the court rendered it's previous deci
sion demonstrably wrong, and the court 's subsequent decision direct
ly Conflicts with it's previous decision affirming a district court's
order against a defendant?

Whether a pre-FSA defendant's circumstances changed by Congress's clarification of §924(c) may constitute extraordinary and compelling reasons for compassionate release