Did Petitioner establish that jurists of reason could debate whether he was deprived of his right to the effective assistance of counsel at his juvenile certification hearing, and did the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals apply an improper and unduly burdensome standard that contravenes this Court's precedent in analyzing this issue?

Did Petitioner establish that jurists of reason could debate whether he was deprived of his right to the effective assistance of counsel at his juvenile certification hearing, and did the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals apply an improper and unduly burdensome standard that contravenes this Court's precedent in analyzing this issue?