1. Whether the Petitioners 5th and 14th Amend. Rights were violated when the reviewing courts denied review on the merits of the case as the Petitioner argued a question of law, De Novo aThe court 's interpretation of the statute is "clearly erroneous.: determination that the court only needs to find (A) the principle lacked capacity to control or revoke agency without subsection (B) a agent's action or inaction threatens "substantial harm " to the principal pursuant 755ILCS 45/2-10 to revoke POA(Power of Attorney).

2. Whether the trial court then violated Petitioner 's right to due process when the Illinois Supreme court already "precludes claims of incapacity as retroactive '' thereby, the appellee 's petition to revoke POA 1 Is moot.

3. Whether an Appellant Court interfered in the appeals process; is prejudicial and a violation of Petitioner 's due process and M^equal protection.

4. Whether the Petitioners 5th and 14th Amendment rights to Due process and Equal protections when the request and payment for a partial transcript of the proceedings and notice had been given to all parties but, the clerk of the Court failed to add the transcript to the record thereby harmed the Petitioner 's chance of reversal.

5. Whether the Petitioner 's 5th and 14th amendment rights were violated when the higher court failed to reverse or review the case on its merits as_court may accept as true the statement of facts when the Appellee failed to participate in the appeals process.

Whether the Petitioners' 5th and 14th Amendment rights were violated when the reviewing courts denied review on the merits of the case as the Petitioner argued a question of law, De Novo