No. 21-7203
Hamid Michael Hejazi v. Michael Schwab
IFP
Tags: adverse-judgment appellate-procedure appellate-review civil-procedure court-dismissal due-process jurisdiction jurisdictional-requirements procedural-default service-of-notice service-of-process standing
Latest Conference:
2022-04-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) Does 14 justice(?) for appellee Commissioner to dismiss Petitioner's appeal, on grounds that Petitioner failed to serve the notice of appeal within 30 days of entry of the adverse judgment — when there was no adverse party opposing (other) party having to be served, no party had been served, summoned in lower court proceedings, appeared, or participated?
2) Where the Oregon Supreme Court justified in denying review of the appellate court decision — in so the Appellate Court wrongly attributed to the other party (Michael Schwab) by Petitioner the status of adverse party respondent?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was it justified for the appellate commissioner to dismiss Petitioner's appeal
Docket Entries
2022-04-25
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2022-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2021-08-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 28, 2022)
Attorneys
Hamid Michael Hejazi
Hamid Michael Hejazi — Petitioner