IS PETITIONER ENTITLED TO IMMEDIATE DISCHARGE, WHERE THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT TRIED AND IMPRISONED PETITIONER FOR INFAMOUS CRIMES WITHOUT PRESENTMENT OR INDICTMENT BY A GRAND JURY?

2. IS PETITIONER ENTITLED TO IMMEDIATE DISCHARGE, WHERE THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS UNILATERALLY MANUFACTURED AND FILED A SPECIOUS SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT TO OBTAIN PETITIONER'S CONVICTION AND IMPRISONMENT WITHOUT PRESENTMENT OR INDICTMENT BY A GRAND JURY?

3. IS PETITIONER ENTITLED TO IMMEDIATE DISCHARGE, WHERE THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT TRIED AND IMPRISONED PETITIONER UNDER COUNTS THAT FAILED TO STATE AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE UNITED STATES?

4. IS THE GOVERNMENT OF UNITED STATES ACTING IN EXCESS OF POWER, IN PROSECUTING PETITIONER FOR INFAMOUS CRIMES IN THE UNITED STATES COURT AND DEPRIVING HIM OF HIS LIBERTY WITHOUT PRESENTMENT OR INDICTMENT BY A GRAND JURY, THE TYPE OF EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCE WARRANTING THE REMEDY AFFORDED BY THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS?

Whether petitioner is entitled to immediate discharge where the United States District Court tried and imprisoned petitioner for infamous crimes without presentment or indictment by a grand jury