This Case Raises Federal Questions Under Article III, Section 2 Of The U.S. Constitution Which Provides That Federal Courts Are To Hear Cases "Arising Under " Questions Regarding Federal Law! The Questions Of Great Jurisdictional and/or National Importance Involve Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 4 (Service Of Process! . Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 12 (Responding To A Summons') . With Other Laws and/or COVID Orders That Due To Their Interpretation and/or Administration Adversely Impacted Our Court 's Functions During This Crisis! This Court 's Decision WILL Significantly Impact and Hopefully Restore The Rights Of All U.S. Individuals Who Were Affected While Ensuring The Continued and Uniform Operation Of Our Courts Under These COVID Orders and/or Written-Laws During This Crisis!

1) What Methods For Service-Of-Process By Litigants and/or Others Must A Court Accept When All Mail Signature-Services and Most State 's Personal Process-Services Had Been SUSPENDED, (Starting In February 2020) Where Service Was Performed As Required By COVID Orders and/or Written-Law?

2) Under What Conditions Is A Magistrate-Judge Allowed To Violate Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 73 and 28 U.S.C. § 636 (c) By Assigning-Themselves To A Case, Without The Consent Of Any Litigant and/or Member Of The Case, In Order To Rule Over The Case?

3) Under What Conditions Are Litigants and/or Others Allowed To Utilize The Mail Service Tracking-Reports As Proof-Of-Service Due To COVID Operational Guidelines Issued By FEDEX, UPS, USPS and Others In March 2020, Which Had SUSPENDED and Made Signature-Services For Mail and/or Package Deliveries Un-Available?

4) Under What Conditions Are Courts Allowed To Defy and/or Reject The Supreme Court Rulings and Written-Law While Exceeding Their Jurisdictional Authority In Order To Deny The Proper-Review Of A Case Under Article III, Section 2 Of The U.S. Constitution Due To Questions Of Law Raised By The COVID Crisis?

5) Under What Conditions Is The Appeals Court Allowed To REFUSE To Allow A VOID Judgement On A Lower Court Ruling, While REFUSING To Allow A Re-Trial Where Their Only Act Was To Affirm The Lower Court Ruling To Block All Reconsideration, Re-Hearing and/or Review To Conceal The Court 's Criminal Misconduct?

6) Under What Conditions Are Courts, Judges and/or Others Allowed To Defy, Reject and/or Violate Their State 's and/or Other 's COVID Orders and/or Written-Laws By;

a) Ordering Service-Of-Process Be Performed By Using Methods Known To Be A Violation Of The Orders and/or Written-Laws, and/or Was NOT-AVAH -ART ,F.?

b) Blocking Allowed Alternative-Methods For Service-Of-Process, Where These Court 's Order Endangered The Health, Safety Of Officials, Servers and Others?

c) Rejecting Service-Of-Process By A Litigant Falselv-Claiminp That It Was An Alternative-Method NOT Allowed For Use Where The Court Later Ordered The Same- Service Be Performed In A Manner Violating Orders and/or Written-

What-methods-for-service-of-process-must-a-court-accept-when-mail-signature-services-and-personal-process-services-were-suspended