No. 21-7173
Herman J. Snell, II v. Oklahoma
IFP
Tags: collateral-attack criminal-procedure due-process fundamental-miscarriage-of-justice fundamental-rights jurisdictional-challenge miscarriage-of-justice state-conviction subject-matter-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2022-04-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. WAS VISGTAT V. OKLAHOMA, 140 S.CT. [CITATION], A COLLATERAL PROCEEDING? DID THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT ENTER A NEW PROCEDURAL RULE OF LAW IN OKLAHOMA — THAT OVERRULES SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION — IN ITS DECISION IN NEGIRT.
2. IS THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA IN VIOLATION OF THE FUNDAMENTAL MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE CLAUSE OR FAILING TO VOID, VACATE, AND DISMISS PETITIONER'S STATE CONVICTION WHEN THE STATE IS FOUND ARE THAT THE COURT NEVER HAD SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OVER PETITIONER.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the United States Supreme Court enter a new procedural rule of law that overrules subject matter jurisdiction?
Docket Entries
2022-04-25
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2022-02-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 24, 2022)
Attorneys
Herman Snell
Herman J. Snell II — Petitioner