Why was I not afforded rights to due process?

How was it decided I had "competent" counsel when my counsel advised me to not work with DFS until the end of my criminal proceedings, and my counsel failed to object to very obvious issues with the proceedings including my treatment plan?

How did the court put any weight into the treatment plan when the dates EVERY section was to be completed by were 6 (six) Months over DFS involvement and 1 (one) year prior to being court ordered?

Why were issues waived to the State appeal on Supreme Court because I didn't object at the District court?

Doesn't this show MY counsel wasn't competent during the proceedings?

Isn't it these counsel's supposed issues because I don't have knowledge of the proceedings?

How was it decided that I had a fundamentally fair proceedings when my counsel clearly paid little or no attention to any issues during the proceedings?

Why was no weight given to the progress I made on treatment plan?

The DFS worker said on record that she made no attempt to verify my progress but it was still decided that I had made no progress?

The DFS worker said on record that the treatment plan was IMPOSSIBLE for me to complete in the time frame. How is this given weight to decide?

Why is the stranged out evidence something as important as parental rights?

Why is my child and I not having my lawyer a chance to answer the motion?

Subsequently the "lack of contact between my child and I" was used as partial basis to terminate my rights?

Shouldn't EVERY parent that wants to have a relationship with their child be afforded that right assuming they are willing and wanting to address issues with mental health and/or Chemical dependency to be a positive force in the child's life?

I was told that the federal courts may not accept my petition because my child doesn't fall under the "Indian Child Welfare Act." As well as, my Case being an Indian. Doesn't Article I, Section 2, Subsection I of the US Constitution guarantee me that the citizens of each state shall be entitled to all privileges and Immunities of citizens in the Several states?

Doesn't the constitution guarantee me review from this court because I'm a united states citizen even though my child doesn't fall under The Indian Child Welfare Act?

Why DID the district court continue with termination hearing when I asked my lawyer withdraw due to conflict of interest?

Why was a motion to terminate contact between my child and my?

Why was TL not afforded rights to due process?