No. 21-7161

Deja Paschal v. Connecticut

Lower Court: Connecticut
Docketed: 2022-02-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process equivocal-request right-to-counsel self-representation sixth-amendment waiver
Latest Conference: 2022-03-18
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether a defendant's request for self-representation, made in the context of expressing frustration with appointed counsel and requesting new counsel, constitutes an unequivocal assertion of the right to self-representation under the Sixth Amendment, or whether such a request can be deemed equivocal and waived by the defendant's subsequent silence when the trial court instructs the defendant to file a motion to clarify the request.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the defendant's request for self-representation was unequivocal, despite being made in the context of a request for new counsel

Docket Entries

2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-28
Waiver of right of respondent State of Connecticut to respond filed.
2022-02-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 21, 2022)

Attorneys

Deja Paschal
James B. StreetoOCPD-LSU, Petitioner
State of Connecticut
Laurie Nadine FeldmanAppellate Bureau, OCSA, Respondent