1. If a state statue's definition of "cocaine " differs from the federal definition of
"cocaine" based on the plain, unambigu ous language of the statutes, is the
District Court's failure to notice this difference "clear" and "obvious" for the
purpose of "plain error" review?
2. Whether an individual who runs aw ay from a police encounter can be
arrested when the basis of th e arrest is not established?

Whether a state statute's definition of 'cocaine' differs from the federal definition based on the plain, unambiguous language of the statutes