Roy Franklin Echols, Jr. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
1. Did the United States District Court Error by denying the January 13,2020, initial No.1 CSX Transportation Corporate Headquarters Address -ho expedite process.
2. Did the United States District Court Fail to disclose the U.S. Marshal's returned unexecuted Summons information that prohibited Petitioner From complying with the Statutory requirements under Fed.R.Civ.Proc(m)?
3. Did the United States District Court deprive EchoLs Right to Notice of Summons And duty to disclose this Factual information pursuant to Fed. Rule Civil Proc. 26?
4. Did the United States District Court deprive EchoLs of his right under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title II, with the physical impairment of Stage III. cancer to proceed without counsel under 28 U.S.C.Sec. 1915(e)(1)?
5. Did the United States District Court deprive EchoLs of remedial and humanitarian provisions under FELA LAW that impose Liability to protect the safety of railroad employees set Forth in FELA 45 U.S.C. §§?
6. Did the United States District Court Fail to hold CSX Transportation Accountable For EchoLs FELA Claim by violating OSHA and FSAA regulations designed to protect people From Unsafe Work environments within the meaning of FELA US U.S.C. §§ 51 - 60(2012)?
7. Did the United States Court of Appeals For the Fourth Circuit Abuse its discretion by denying Appointed Counsel under 28 U.S.C.Sec. 1915(e)(1) relating to Covid-19 Limitations (i.e. No Sxl Law Library Attendance to Access Local rules, prepare informal brief or certification to CSX Transp.JInc.)?
Did the United States District Court err in denying the initial request to expedite process?