Frederick Allen v. United States
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
WAS DUE PROCESS VIOLATED WHEN THE DISTRICT COURT PLAGIARIZED A 31-COUNT WORD-FOR-WORD/COMMA-FOR-COMMA MISREPRESENTATION ORIGINALLY ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE GOVERNMENT UPON WHICH RELIEF WAS DENIED?
WAS FREDERICK OLLEN'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL VIOLATED WHEN HIS TRIAL COUNSEL FAILED TO RECOGNIZE AND OBJECT TO A MANIFEST ERROR WHEN THE GOVERNMENT FAILED TO DISCLOSE DURING OR BEFORE TRIAL THAT THE KEY WITNESS HAD BEEN SPARED A MANDATORY LIFE SENTENCE IN EXCHANGE FOR HIS COOPERATION?
Was Frederick Muse's constitutional right to due process violated when the district court plagiarized a 31-count word-for-word/comma-for-comma misrepresentation originally attributable to the government upon which relief was denied?