No. 21-7100

Alkiohn Dunkins v. Pennsylvania

Lower Court: Pennsylvania
Docketed: 2022-02-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: cellsite-information constitutional-protections criminal-procedure due-process fourth-amendment law-enforcement privacy privacy-rights search-and-seizure standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-04-14
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the Lower Courts erred by being forced to suppress the cell-site information under this Courts opinion in Carpenter?

Whether the Lower Courts opinion on this case substantially deviates from this Courts decision to Carpenter because the cell site information is a distinction input at differences sent of aware of its the quality?

Whether the rights reserved by the Fourth Amendment in ATTEMPT bate Const Pd Har protects individuals from the Government?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower courts erred by denying the petitioner's motion to suppress cell-site information

Docket Entries

2022-04-18
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-02-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 14, 2022)

Attorneys

Alkiohn Dunkins
Alkiohn Dunkins — Petitioner
Pennsylvania
Katharine Rae KurnasNorthampton County District Attorney's Office, Respondent