Question 1: Whether a Court can neglect the legal and statutory obligations of an agency to adhere to a signed contract and the referenced clauses; by saying the contract was "effectively " completed?

Question 2: Whether a Court can rely on "facts " that are in conflict with the testimony of the Contracting Officer?

Question 3: Whether the Court erred in discounting evidence that the Contractor suffered a reprisal for disclosing information about violations of law and other conditions that she believed posed a specific and substantial danger?

Question 4: Whether "bad faith " entitles a contractor to the lost profits of the unexercised option years stipulated in a signed contract?

Whether a Court can neglect the legal and statutory obligations of an agency to adhere to a signed contract and the referenced clauses