No. 21-7073
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process electronic-hearing in-person-hearing probation trial-court-objection video-conference virtual-hearing
Latest Conference:
2022-03-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a virtual, video conference, or other hearing that takes place using an electronic or computer medium is sufficient to meet the due process requirements in criminal cases as set forth by the United States Constitution and this Court, and whether an objection to such medium is one that must be first raised at the trial court level.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a virtual, video conference, or other hearing that takes place using an electronic or computer medium is sufficient to meet the due process requirements in criminal cases
Docket Entries
2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-24
Waiver of right of respondent Alabama to respond filed.
2022-02-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 10, 2022)
Attorneys
Nathaniel Collins
David Benton King — Williams, Driskill, Huffstutler & King, Petitioner
State of Alabama
Beth Slate Poe — AL Attorney General's Office, Respondent