Kimmie Dwayne Baker v. Arizona
1. Shola the Inoldina of Uritted States Ve Elbechnact SYe le. VL (2005), " thak im his Case Coovermment Vieo\eeready bo Yespond, and Yor Contest Whe merits of the Taly 3 22 Motion, Viet 'oy Moving ke Aismiss on the \ansig of Lorri meliness SVS OF 2 Be YevViewed Ow Sas oF Cervioracy,
(A) Anew trial motion Was Nek Shroctly ofbey 7 Wy WAS Aiseovered on July 7, tot, oat She Govermment Dailed to Fe on 'he yyotion,
Co) the. Motion cA\leges Excrloatec 7 evidence Wiad Would \rave Chromed Me OW Come
e) Mee Merion Yertoams to a July te) 202, Neoo\ng TO Wiimine ond Preclude at "Acia\ oO Aeveoma y efercknent= Of Elenromic_ Secret Side VYearvonee Vepocy Aesoelared With vA adsudicakion vada s.
Whether the government was obligated to respond and contest the merits of the July 3, 2022 motion, rather than moving to dismiss on the basis of untimeliness