Has thousands of people been wrongfully convicted by Courts of law, facts (drug introduction into correctional institutions) and "illicit sex acts)" in the presence of women and "children" in light at the fact the lower Courts has "deem" both alarming forms of conduct to be "non-criminal"?

(1) Are the lower Courts properly using its "physical facts" when it declares drug introduction into a correctional institution and illicit sex acts)?

(3) Can a lower Courts ruling, that misapplied the correct legal standard (i.e. the criteria at above questions) deprive a defendant of exculpatory defense, thereby becoming Undue Influence "in the guilty plea entry context?

Whether the lower courts have properly used their 'physical force' when declaring certain conduct, such as 'drug introduction' and 'illicit sex acts' in the presence of women and children, as 'non-criminal'