Timothy George Muller v. Michigan
CriminalProcedure Securities
MR. MULLED- EaJT/TIE D To uoiTA/TIRA lS
DlEA AMD Tai/E /J& CoaJTclVoa} fa/Z DEA iuEAY oE
6orimoU.tX> SuBSfAAJCE tAOZiti^DEATbJ VACATED,
l$EC/kJSE 'BaZj'Z'/ dChJK J7V UJAs Af£>~ 7A/e DDoPFiC
$& aj& tYe. ej/adges , lja/eye teIeX IS
VEAJUE 70
Dec/i/E^V ALLF&FbLV OCCutlXeD 7aJ AIaJT EoUaJe/
A/OB JJlT DEOCA 10TEE XaJ^ESTT l) 3 / 77/f DECEDENT
TAJ /{£ a)T C.OQ aJT'/.
" \/ ■' 7es . PJ,l'/osicf cS/kS60£(^Sj
UJAS 77//$ J.S5UT AJoT CJA/ uED 3/ JVR. p/uZ/ED ^
Afa C6a)TTST DIE A uSDeeE T/2/ ac EcoaIstI's
EA/luEE 72) DA/ST XT UaIBEE/V'/OED X/E
vac/Djt/ of 77/f Ufa ttstlf .it .:
- s/ //
i . D^-/> benef drt scoe-r *
Whether the trial court erred in denying Mr. Muller's motion to withdraw his plea and vacate his conviction for delivery of a controlled substance causing death, where the alleged delivery occurred in Kent County but the charges were brought in Barry County