No. 21-7057
Victor Nava, Jr. v. United States
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act borden-v-united-states career-offender-guideline crime-of-violence enumerated-offense-clause reckless-aggravated-assault reckless-assault sentencing-guidelines texas-law
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-03-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Does the Supreme Court's holding in Borden v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 1817 (2021) that a reckless aggravated assault cannot qualify as a "crime of violence" under the elements clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act mean that a reckless injury-causing robbery (under Texas law) likewise cannot qualify as a "crime of violence" under the enumerated offense clause of the Career Offender Guideline?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a reckless injury-causing robbery qualify as a 'crime of violence' under the Career Offender Guideline?
Docket Entries
2022-03-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
2022-02-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-01-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 7, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Victor Nava, Jr.
John Andrew Kuchera — Attorney at Law, Petitioner