Did Anoc violate Petihonec's constitutional right tobe secuce inthis papers, dnd to du o-pcocess. of lan by comoving his documents te tne U 'S.Supcem eLouck frome _the_ prison! 5 authoriz ed depository for the U.S RostalSeauef =

2, Did ADOC, by com oving Retitio aec's. mail from -the.pcisoa's USPS depositony,, and ___
_by feleify, og-a USPS docu ant to conceal _its Hrelt, violate. Lode. callowes,

Yo.

| tie uses t10_Obstruction of mails genecally,
_*_I8_uses 1102__Obsteuckion of coreespondences
_*_i8_uscs 1105 Delay ordesteuction of ma iLo CnewSpaperss
__+ IB us¢s i108 Theft oc-ceceiptof stolen mat! matter genecally sand,
| ___+ fp uses i702 Thal of mail anatter by of fice Coctrployee.

3, Did ADOC violate Poti Honec's constitubonal eight to.due.peocess shen it fi a
| interfered with, the a-simnply denied his kelephone.access to the Supreme Cock?

-—_1__Did ADOC violate Petihionec's constitutional cight to due process by cceating
_cules, specific to Pebhonec, in-ordec to pcevent hi m_frorholding GEO Legal Mail
| ___actountable for bis. parcels that donot coach the local post office?

|S Does a prison violate o peisonec's_constituhonal_ci diit_to_due process by.nat provi ding _
___inodeen_(securce) access to the. courts, in acdec tog overn his documentation that
wall actually reach the courts?

Did ADOC violate Petitioner's constitutional rights to free-speech, due-process, and access-to-courts by removing his documents from the authorized USPS depository and interfering with his telephone access to the Supreme Court?