No. 21-7040
Harshadkumar Nanjibhai Jadav v. J. Woodson, Warden
IFP
Tags: closing-argument constitutional-rights due-process fair-trial false-evidence prosecutorial-misconduct trial-procedure
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-04-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
A. Does the prosecutor's deliberate use of a known false evidence—which is also an outside evidence—during closing argument violate the accused's Constitutional Rights?
II. Did this State's interference and subsequent failure to object by defense counsel violate the accused's constitutional Rights?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the prosecutor's deliberate use of known false evidence during closing argument violate the accused's Constitutional rights?
Docket Entries
2022-04-04
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2022.
2022-01-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 3, 2022)
Attorneys
Harshadkumar Jadav
Harshadkumar Nanjibhai Jadav — Petitioner