No. 21-7027

Raul Mendez v. Ada County, Idaho, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-02-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: administrative-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection-clause frcp-12(b)(6) mandatory-services motion-to-dismiss pro-se property-tax-lien standing
Latest Conference: 2022-04-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

1) Is a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to FRCP 12(b) (6) a ruling on a question of law? If so, is this Motion inappropriate when applied to Pro se complaints?

2) Can local government entities take adverse actions against its citizens without Due Process for not using the provided utility services?

3) Should Pro se parties be allowed an opportunity to include evidence and to amend their complaints alleging violations under the 1983 Statute?

4) Is race or any other protected class status a requirement in order to prove a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the US Constitution?

5) Is proof of a crime a requirement for a Civil Rico violation?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) a ruling on a question of law? If so, is this Motion inappropriate when applied to Pro se complaints?

Docket Entries

2022-04-04
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2022.
2021-12-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 3, 2022)
2021-10-05
Application (21A57) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 31, 2021 to December 30, 2021, submitted to Justice Kagan.
2021-10-05
Application (21A57) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until December 30, 2021.

Attorneys

Raul Mendez
Raul Mendez — Petitioner