Ms. Ewing asserts that the previcis court erred when it did not grant a C.O.A. despite the debatability of the District Court's opinion by a reasonable jurist

Ms Ewing asserts that the previcus ceurt was in error when denied her moton based on its own merts determination t a her ineffective assstance of ceounsel claim.

Ms. Ewing asserts that the Atford plea is misleading in the 'maintaining of inncence" as defendent is treated as though they are quilty beyond a shadow of a doubt without prosecutors having one's quilt, innocentce or effectiueness of counsel.

Whether the previous court erred in denying Ms. Ewing's motion based on its own merits determination of her ineffective assistance of counsel claim