No. 21-7008
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-protocol criminal-procedure due-process federal-constitution habeas-corpus judicial-discretion mental-evaluation state-constitution supreme-court-review
Latest Conference:
2022-05-26
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER "THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT WRONGFULLY DECIDED AN IMPORTANT ISSUE RAISED TO THEM BY PETITIONER MARCO DANE ACOFF WHERE HE WAS DENIED A TIMELY AND MEANINGFUL MENTAL EVALUATION WHEN THE STATE'S HIGHEST COURT WAS REPUGNANT TO THE PREVIOUS DECISIONS RENDERED BY THIS COURT AS WELL AS TO THE PROTOCOLS OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-the-alabama-supreme-court-wrongfully-decided-an-important-issue
Docket Entries
2022-05-31
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-05-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/26/2022.
2022-04-06
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-03-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
2021-12-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2022)
Attorneys
Marco Dane Acoff
Marco Dane Acoff — Petitioner