No. 21-7004
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: affidavit-deficiency civil-procedure deterrence exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment good-faith-exception recurring-negligence standing systemic-negligence
Latest Conference:
2022-02-25
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Should certiorari be granted on a petitioner's claim that the deterrent purpose of the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule does not perform its intended purpose when the good faith exception is applied to an affiant who has been repeatedly warned not to submit deficient affidavits but continues to commit the same type errors.
2. Should certiorari be granted on a petitioner's claim that certiorari should be granted to clarify its holding on what does the Supreme Court have in mind when it speaks of "recurring or systemic negligence."
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the good-faith exception apply when an affiant has been repeatedly warned not to submit deficient affidavits?
Docket Entries
2022-02-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/25/2022.
2022-02-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-01-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2022)
2021-11-05
Application (21A122) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until January 6, 2022.
2021-10-28
Application (21A122) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 7, 2021 to January 6, 2022, submitted to Justice Barrett.
Attorneys
Adam Lee Ware
Adam L. Ware — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent