1. Whether the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania and the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit erred and abused their discretion and entered decisions in conflict wife decisions of other courts and relevant decisions of this Court in dismissing Petitioner's combined civil rights action against several prison officials (Bivens claims) and the United States (FTCA claims)?

2. Whether the District Court and the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit have decided important federal question in a way that conflicts with decisions of other courts and have so far significantly departed from the ususual and acceppted course of judicial proceedings in granting summary judgments to several prison officials and the United States simply based on the Defendants' denial of guilt and lies and complete fabrications and orchestrations and machinations and manipulations and most misleading arguments and numerous deliberately falsified official govememnt records and false and perjurious testimonies at the bench trial?

3. Whether the Petitioner's unique and peculiar and exceptional and special circumstances and certain compelling reasons and extraordinary matters of great Constitutional importance would call for this Court's attention to exercise its discretionary and supervisory power to review and to grant his Petition without precedent and to restrain and to hold prison officials and the United States fully and completely liable and accountable and ' responsible for their actions and inactions that resulted in the most horrific civil rights violations and deprivation of federally protected fundamental Consitutional rights of the Petitioner [RegassaJ?

Whether the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania and the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit erred and abused their discretion