No. 21-6990
Roger D. Roberts v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-violation criminal-procedure drug-crimes due-process evidence-standard habeas-corpus informant-credibility police-misconduct search-and-seizure state-court-review
Latest Conference:
2022-03-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
How did the prosecutor use evidence of a drug sell allegedly by Mr. Roberts an informant where there was no Us.nq 2 were purchased from Mr. Robert's the drugs Controlled buy J7 1) residence.
why Cred:bil:ty of the the wasnt Why AkRon, OH Police Dept →4+ Detective was Boiler Plate language or tactics allowed to use Search Mr. Roberts to obtain to a warrant 1 Why did AKRON Police Say that C.I purchused a large quantity of drugs initially $20 purchased When in
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the prosecutor's use of evidence obtained from a confidential informant was lawful, where the informant's credibility was questionable
Docket Entries
2022-03-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
2022-02-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2022)
Attorneys
Roger D. Roberts
Roger D. Roberts — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent