0 1$ 1^ gDvm&j &aa<1 pftul&A/V- 'fhat ~ib£s
OWd de^lai aw-A dismissal op a wiefwi -&/- n^/ieT
•(^mw ay^Uyd£M/v(- -Pmuac I <^>&n +M b&
(^AS^(U/'eA 4-0 W_ V/V'Vl^ 'p^J ljL^(^_/ iaJhjUx 4fads flftiLP(s)
Qft u|r&n O- ^AA€-m^)V J<Ai^^W^/vV- — (5^ 4W>
C/G/tTe/vi^V Jo/U/tSd- W2)0 dcu^j 6 8-^ d/vfnj — ^w4 "^eIbclSvs \V\o2*r a
(O^WLAA-€-d
HAcW 4<H~ /m<j Jk. Vk»<^H+^ -Hv. -^^oaA i/fivi 4he 6^r-f ls •/W.J'?^/teLC/vc^
z3 May Ceuuc&eJl be ra&t&ed a.
fevi-eu) u^Ke/\ caa O&M 's ^oaW-ed ky V(tfu£
gttAd/i cJa^-s e-f caJe t>p£M $i/d&wpT- oP 4W3) Si'u^kA a fe^PcAsa.t Avyfwvt" radieT 1 4^4 -fnuAd i^r&n
4he, CeurV [aa<4i "Hve refused oomts [nj weu] $ 5mm/
ki,wA-S 6©a£"A I'fvtAvs/ux/ ('Oi/O't W^aa^lg^-j t^^ f*4^(.& l CoiaTT/ k^e 4\? W-c. 5'u!i3,ij'c^4"
l---iA>uj/\ 4w> ^w-dgeYW-Ad- Is -few
pe+i Wr? P^e2^p-|l^vteuj uspg/i
btj

Is it fair, just, sound, and prudent that the denial and dismissal of a motion for relief from a judgment for fraud upon the court be considered to be unappealable when the order(s) open a contempt judgment on the basis that a contempt judgment must be appealed within 30 days of entry, and the motion for relief was and is brought on new evidence of the fraud upon the court?