No. 21-6984
Hamid Michael Hejazi v. Oregon
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appellate-review civil-procedure court-procedure due-process fraud judgment judgment-standard legal-appealability motion-dismissal procedural-rules standing
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
0 b/ftS it justified the Oregon
review oP theCourt to oeme
den appellate O-emmLESta/ierls deal - 3 "
Sio,n -to dismiss Petitioner's
Op tWe dircuitappeal - dv\ the. basts
Coar+ 's oP denial and dismissal
r relief -Pro m ofi Petitlow£r's motion p»a judgement
Pur Proudupon the Oeurt ('Per ORCP )not
tein^ appealable. ?
'2-) 'Should a denial andl dismissal oP a mo-dem Pw
f€/liep Prom a
Court be deemed -to bejudgement Po-r Proud UpOY^ 4V\&
appeaA ol\q[ e — so +o be.
able, 4*> have, errors fey lowe^ tou.r4* in said
proceed Ino^ be 'fevieuted ?
^ and- deter vninattdm '.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-31
Waiver of right of respondent Oregon to respond filed.
2021-08-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2022)
Attorneys
Hamid Michael Hejazi
Hamid Michael Hejazi — Petitioner
Oregon
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent