fc-f F11) M-6, QjS^poN CS- V>'Oi -tHS gpPossiMQ P/viz-nss bapKolf
To THE P6lI<f[chH£-^ f'jg.i&MMA-l l.&iH ip I ft f M ^
2) k>D ~tt-(& hi^-Knrj- ranter Fml to PiU A-]oco
gg/njlHr Aix/<$fcAA6-r 4-s Prn . g, £ W■' L—\hs<?i>MZ j-,?C)aaJA^ TJk Mft-TfEfE 0l.SMJSE€O \A'TH<un Pr«.$odi.C£
4) THE Y£TiT7oni£,E- j NJUdTiom TO Q~S£ -Kin -nfr gf.sPQNpfcMr'ft Wraoh- ^ef^es tH& Disw/ssaj -'Th S€TT|e "Wt5 H^HTTbfg C?) THe T>eT>Tiw<g& <S^o v4H "b
U)VAlpt CoutT ?govjrtg^ D MX AvtGoe7M.6K T , &>HT<e5TeD> Cz.g"0 Ufrc. TH&
TRc PeTTtnwag- f1 o f-ftpl »i iftt THE RigsftoAP eHTs - i.
g) bp t4& pgriTitWgg. f»\6 fel foe bef»o|t Mb
ih ft tt(wel^ ^AMHeie.
*0 tb\0 TH£ PeTOi^E^ -FyU At>e<PufrTE. A^O (£&FVk7MM3l£
To ^6-Op0i ^6>gF6C€ 'THC SgLfY (# 2£>V\ g?^0£H MO 'PttBN.flFVzt^
\p) W&<€ ~TRE Pft^Xtes ft*<S*-tgg. q<l (Zjsp)i«£.p Ta
|?qk\6 _
, U~) t))Q Trfe u.s. b?sretc-T gomex Cle^ / r^>4ce&o To m fa<j; of
Mjgfee-.^g ''opp^^g *>Ag-T.6* ft tezptMA," flg„ 1 7QCOZg. To
-tb
uerfeKL -to THg PeTiTioHeiz,
>j-) T>|0 THS PfULTir, ^ Fm( Ti < Mm. 1
Fftcr*ft r>KP,)Tfi M_T- TWg M/ATeinKl
Whether the district court erred in dismissing the petitioner's case without prejudice