The first question presented is: whether review of a civil rights discrimination violation holding from an Article I bankruptcy tribunal is precluded by an Article III court based on the judicially-originated "equitable mootness" doctrine?

The second question presented is: whether review of a property rights violation holding from an Article I bankruptcy tribunal is precluded by an Article III court based on the judicially-originated "equitable mootness" doctrine?

The third question presented is: whether reliance on the doctrine of "equitable mootness" by an Article III Court is proper to avoid review of the non-Article III court in the absence of a motion to stay a bankruptcy reorganization plan six months prior to entry of a final appealable order?

Whether review of a civil rights discrimination violation holding from an Article I bankruptcy tribunal is precluded by an Article III court based on the 'equitable mootness' doctrine?