No. 21-6967
Lemonta Markuis Maddox v. California
IFP
Tags: civil-rights coerced-confessions constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-law interrogation involuntary-statements plea-bargaining state-law
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2022-03-25
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is it rightly lawful for a detective to obtain involuntary statements by coercion and promises of leniency violating federal and state constitutional rights to due Process.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the use of coerced statements obtained through false promises of leniency violates federal and state constitutional rights to due process
Docket Entries
2022-03-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
2021-12-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2022)
Attorneys
Lemonta Maddox
Lemonta Markuis Maddox — Petitioner