I In Florida, e criminal defendant hes a first
eppecl as a matter of c:qht and t
theappointment
of counsel for said oppeal. under Floridd case law a
state ouct regarding the cr
rimina convistionwkile
represented
by appointed, or retained counsel. Further,
IS an appellate
sunsel foils t preserve for Federal
review, oc"FE
deralize," a clain a criminal defendant
hes, no stote coust vehicle is evaileble to remidy the
failure to Federalize the claim. Does coust
"cause" for c default when the deferdant does not
defendent a liar
the prasecntot stated during closing arqument
thet "the only
way you can possibly acquit him
clasing argument constitute a proper argument
simply a comment on the evidence."?
that :s

Whether a criminal defendant can make any findings in any state court regarding the criteria for conviction while represented by appointed counsel, further, as an appellate counsel fails to preserve for federal review a claim of a criminal defendant that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction