1. Isn't a questionable claim by the defendant's that the Discharged Peace-time Veteran who had been discharged to a soft landing usually is when the Statutes of Limitation ran?

2. However, not in the favor of the defendant but in the favor of the Petitioner the Veteran. Isn't it cruel and unusual when the 3rd Party Commercial Attorneys added Prejudice to the documents before sending them to the Veterans as a Civilian to the Petitioner, or then what does Prejudice mean on an Honorable Discharge causing an unusual Inequity of property liquidation against the Petitioner?

3. Why is Prima Facie allowed for Governmental use and their 3rd Party Attorneys who are insider traders? When an Honorable is supposed to be unquestionable: However, when an Honorable with the 3rd Party insiders and Political Parties and Attorneys who make the use of it a contract? An Honorable Discharge should be an Honorable Discharge?

4. ) In similarity of the above: The Charging Official delivers charges that are politically charged and call them two different allegations; with double jeopardy it is called Expeditious Discharge instead the Petitioner was supposed to get the Expedition Medal for Going to Germany which doesn't show on the records. Yet somehow, the same Fraternity has allowed all Fraternities to cause conflict of interest as for instance the U.S. Attorney is a U.S. Commercial Attorney who would seem like she could collectively bargain. However, she is falsily claiming some sort of agreement which does violate Title 18 U.S.C. 1028A doesn't which puts a cinch in the Respondents Affirmative Defense of Statutes of Limitation.

5. ) At SEC 10(b) isn't it illegal to abolish a MOS in the Military as well as insider trading by a group of citizens; 'Which can isolate an individual (The Petitioner) from his own income?

Isn't a questionable claim by the defendant's that the Discharged Peace-time Veteran who had been discharged to a soft landing usually is when the Statutes of Limitation ran?