No. 21-6926
Willie Wilcher v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-provisions criminal-law due-process firearms judicial-review jurisdiction legal-standard procedural-requirements rehaif-v-united-states statutory-interpretation statutory-provisions
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
Wlu4er He Low<tf Courh fai j urtsAicfan fa tJWn decJ? fa
CAtej i*Sed P-eh<if \js 2/<?/ faoli), An^ fa gownm^
Few fro^ por veriifW- Hef Pekb^,%/fav he f^ldn^pw and fat
fa jiffy iftwcf pfm/vd -the far elememh ftJquin jd fa fa jug bojuJo/i
4q fa juy> A(\d ftefatf o reWvufM'ly fapUabk, fa /Ww/5 fate $8 dSX. fcefaftntr 5
9d&((0( \X
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Lower Courts had jurisdiction to decide the case based on Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 814 (2019), and the government never proved nor verified that the petitioner knew he could not possess a firearm, and the jury never proved the four elements required to convict based on Rehaif's requirements
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 22, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Willie Wilcher
Willie Wilcher — Petitioner