No. 21-6922
Jeffrey Charles Rodd v. Leann LaRiva, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights deliberate-indifference discovery district-court due-process eighth-circuit procedural-error standing summary-judgment
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
(1) Did the District Court error in dismissing Mr. Rodd's complaint without the benefit of discovery to further support his deliberate indifference claim.
(2) Was summary judgment also premature in the instant case due to disputed facts in the record.
(1.) Did the District Court and the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals error in not ruling on Mr. Rodd's Physical incapacitation argument before the District Court and Appeal Court.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the District Court err in dismissing Mr. Rodd's complaint without the benefit of discovery to further support his deliberate indifference claim
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 22, 2022)
Attorneys
Jeffrey Charles Rodd
Jeffrey Charles Rodd — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent