No. 21-692
Sergeant Haystings, et al. v. Albert B. Korb
Tags: administrative-remedies civil-procedure civil-rights exhaustion-requirement federal-rules-of-civil-procedure judicial-procedure prison-litigation-reform-act standing supplemental-pleading
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
When a prisoner violates the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e et seq., by initiating litigation without first exhausting administrative remedies, can the prisoner escape that violation by filing a supplemental pleading under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(d)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a prisoner can cure a violation of the Prison Litigation Reform Act's mandatory pre-suit exhaustion requirement by filing a supplemental pleading under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(d)
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-21
Reply of petitioners Sgt. Haystings, et al. filed.
2022-01-10
Brief of respondent Albert Korb in opposition filed.
2021-11-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part and the time is extended to and including January 10, 2022.
2021-11-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 10, 2021 to February 8, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-11-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 10, 2021)
Attorneys
Albert Korb
Michael Hugh McGinley — Dechert LLP, Respondent
Sgt. Haystings, et al.