No. 21-6915

Maxwell Gaffney v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-01-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: burden-of-proof causation criminal-law criminal-statute drug-distribution drug-trafficking federal-law foreseeability judicial-review jury-instructions proximate-cause sentencing
Latest Conference: 2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)

Kyle Rodriguez died after voluntarily using heroin. The government proved to a
jury he bought it from Petitioner Maxwell Gaffney. The Government also proved
that this heroin use was the "but-for cause" of his death. However, there was a
multitude of intervening factors (alcohol, tolerance, use of suboxone, induced
vomiting) and other potential sources of drugs supplied to Kyle (ignored by the
prosecution), which the jury was not allowed to specifically address. This was
because, relying on Ninth Circuit precedent, the District Court declined to give an
instruction on proximate causation.

The question thus posed, which was deferred in Burrage v. United States, 571
U.S. 204 (2014) is whether the enhanced penalty provision of 21 U.S.C.
§841(b)(1)(C) requires a showing of proximate causation and therefore the jury
should be so instructed.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the enhanced penalty provision of 21 U.S.C. §841(b)(1)(C) requires a showing of proximate causation

Docket Entries

2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-01-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 22, 2022)

Attorneys

Maxwell Gaffney
Keith Howard RutmanKeith H. Rutman, Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent