No. 21-6912
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review cell-phone-data constitutional-rights counsel-performance criminal-procedure fourth-amendment fourth-amendment-jurisprudence ineffective-assistance plea-withdrawal privacy reasonable-expectation-of-privacy search-and-seizure
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
liE TItetZ ntElZE E)(1 sr A- SLIFF x cr-c-ry T
E577.1SLtsli P8 - 7ri n on/ PLEA oF Gu I . L Ptiaulinrr m caw -r
ON& (*I Che-rded vio La,.1-7 o Ai
Cam-) CI), (10 (1.)(FA ) AND 8(16 OF TITLE 2i use Sll
WHEVE12 COW' oF AppeyLs Fut 7716- SEvErtrm CL-Ratir
EP-426-0 When? DezEerninle 77-1-ffr counsel RAZ 77/e- PEP norVek
evi 8 Tj cow aki Our) ft - Moroni 70 W iTlfDRAW MS' 'fl WOAD
Be Fe-ivot,ous When? Th AppatAri r r-4 712' cw-id jvsr ReAscw
Tb W I T1t pelivu Jfis _Ptert 45' m EX 10/i'c, L, pis'aiverwuo
THE Frtc-tuitt, B YIS FDR, 77tE 6th 1. 4P L ?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the government's warrantless seizure and search of a person's cell phone data violates the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-01-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 22, 2022)
Attorneys
Jamar Jones
Jamar Jones — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent