1- An Indictment whose "True Bill" is only signed by the US District Attorney to arrest and criminally prosecute an accused is valid, even when the signature or signatures of the AUSAs that normally act as "attorney for the government " is absent from said "True Bill" before the Grand Jury?

2- Does Rule #7 (c) (11 of Federal Criminal Procedure require that every "attorney for the government " that participates before a Grand Jury be a signatory to the True Bill of the indictment produced, for it to be valid?

3- Can a federal judge or magistrate authorize an amendment and substitution of an Indictment, when it is requested by an AUSA that did not participate in the supervision of the Grand Jury as "attorney for the government " in its determination of probable cause?

4- Did the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit commit an abuse of judicial discretion in upholding the dismissal of the Mandamus requested by the petitioner, when the Respondent did not submit a response to the Appellant 's Brief and the Court refused to discuss and evaluate the absurd interpretation of the District Court on Rule #7 of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which said Court used to dismiss the Mandamus?

Questions Presented for Court Review