X. What is the proper standard of review when it comes to the question of a void judgment and/or a constitutional question, and/or question of law, and/or question of jurisdiction? Did the district court and appeals court commit error when it did not use de novo review as the standard of review?

2. Can a void judgment be afforded any legal protections?

3. Did Petitioner timely file his notice of appeal?

4. Can multiple timely filed Rule 60b post judgment motions be filed, after a final judgment is entered? Does each timely filed Rule 60b post judgment motion stops the clock on the original final judgment entered?

5. Did the appeals court and district court commit error in failing to and/or improperly applying statutes 28 USC 636 and 28 USC 1291 and Appellate Federal of Civil Procedure 4(a)(4)(A) and 4(a)(4)(A)(vi)?

6. Did Petitioner timely file his Motion for Panel Rehearing?

7. Is a judgment and/or order void when it does not adhere to statute?

8. Did the appeals court commit error in this case when it affirmed void judgments) and failed to fully, fairly, and materially engaged Petitioner's brief that was timely filed?

9. Did the district court judge lose jurisdiction in this case when it failed to adhere to federal statute 28 USC 453, the justices and judges' oath, does that render any and/or all the Memorandum and Recommendations, the orders adopting the Memorandum and Recommendations, Final Judgments, and orders on the motion to strike null and void, when it failed to adhere to its federal statutory oath?

10. Did the district court judge commit error when it granted the employer's motion to dismiss on Thomas' first set of claims of sex, age, race discrimination, sexual harassment, and hostile work environment?

11. Did the district court commit error when it ordered Thomas to abandon his sex, age, and race discrimination claims, as well as his sexual harassment and hostile work environment?

12. Did the district court commit error when it granted Christine O'Brien's motion to dismiss Thomas' race discrimination and retaliation claims against O'Brien, both sets from the internal complaint dated June 14th, 2016 and second internal complaint on October 2016?

13. Did the district court commit error when it dismissed Thomas' claims against the individual defendants in this case, William Pitts, Karen Pitts, Matt Trimble, and Mario Tamez, as well as employer, Link Staffing Management L.L.C.?

14. Did the district court commit error when it granted Christine O'Brien and the employers' motion for summary judgment on both sets of Thomas' discrimination and retaliation claims? race

15. Is any and/or all the Memorandum and Recommendations, orders adopting the Memorandum and Recommendations, Final Judgments, Post Judgments and orders on the motion to strike null and void due to them being inconsistent with due process of law, and/or no actual recording of the proceedings, and/or lack of jurisdiction, and/or the lack of authority to act by the district court?

16. Did the district court commit error when it dismissed Thomas' motions to dismiss under Rule 60(b)?

17. Did the district court commit error when it did not adhere to Talon.v. Cotton, 572 U.S. 650 (2014)?

18. Did the court of appeals commit error when it affirmed the district court judgment based on its general

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and seizures