What is the proper standard of review when it comes to the question of a void judgment and/or a constitutional question, and/or question of law, and/or question of jurisdiction? Did the district court and appeals court commit error when it did not use de novo review as the standard of review in this case?

Can a void judgment be afforded any legal protections?

Did the court of appeals commit error when it ruled Appellant did not adequately brief his arguments on appeal and did not adequately brief his Fifth Amendment due process, lack of subject matter jurisdiction and null and void judgment arguments?

Is a judgment and/or order void due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction when it does not adhere to statute?

Did the appeals court commit error in this case when it affirmed void judgment(s) and failed to fully, fairly, and materially engaged Petitioner's brief that was timely filed?

Did the district court judge lose jurisdiction in this case when it failed to adhere to federal statute 28 USC 453, the justices and judges' oath, does that render any and/or all the Memorandum and Recommendations, the orders adopting the Memorandum and Recommendations, Final Judgments, null and void, when it failed to adhere to its federal statutory Oath and is inconsistent with due process?

Did the district court judge commit error when it granted Mads Nipper and Henrik Christansen motion to dismiss without due process?

Did the district court commit error when it granted Jonatham Hamp Adam, Steve Marshall, Thomas Braun Larsen, Paddi Riopelie, Lonnie Padilla, Chau Nguyen, Billy Baxter, and Terry Jalufka motion to dismiss ruling they were not properly served and Appellant was not given due process and the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction and/or authority to do so.?

Did the district court commit error when it accepted hearsay from Steve Marshall?

Did the district court commit error when it summary judgment to defendants Grundfos, CBS and Grundfos Americas?

Did the district court commit error when it granted Christine O'Brien and the employers' motion for summary judgment on both sets of Thomas' race discrimination and retaliation claims?

Is any and/or all the Memorandum and Recommendations, orders adopting the Memorandum and Recommendations, Final Judgments, Post Judgments null and void due to them being inconsistent with due process of law, and/or no actual recording of the proceedings, and/or lack of jurisdiction, and/or the lack of authority to act by the district court?

Did the district court commit error when it did not adhere to Talon v. Cotton, 572 U.S. 650 (2014), in not weighing evidence in favor Appellant and not giving all favorable inference to Appellant?

Did the district court commit error when it ruled Appellant did not make a prima facie showing for same-sexual harassment and hostile work environment?

Did the district court have the subject matter jurisdiction and/or statutory authority to enter in the Memorandum and Recommendations and orders adopting the Memorandum and Recommendations, the Final Judgment and Post Judgment in this case?

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant statutory provisions