No. 21-6899
John B. Alberts v. Grady Perry, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: automobile-exception container criminal-procedure fourth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel laptop-computer laptop-evidence private-property search-and-seizure
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-03-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Trial Counsel was Ineffective for Failing to Move to Suppress Computer Evidence on the Ground that a Search Pursuant to the Automobile Exception does not Encompass a Laptop Computer as a "Container " within a Vehicle Parked, and Unoccupied on the Owner's Private Residential Property.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Trial Counsel was Ineffective for Failing to Move to Suppress Computer Evidence on the Ground that a Search Pursuant to the Automobile Exception does not Encompass a Laptop Computer as a 'Container' within a Vehicle Parked, and Unoccupied on the Owner's Private Residential Property
Docket Entries
2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-16
Waiver of right of respondent Grady Perry, Warden to respond filed.
2021-12-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 17, 2022)
Attorneys
Grady Perry, Warden
Zachary Lewis Barker — Office of the Tennessee Attorney General, Respondent
John B. Alberts
John B. Alberts — Petitioner