No. 21-6880
IFP
Tags: civil-rights clearly-established-law due-process federal-courts federal-review habeas-corpus standing state-prisoner successive-petition successive-petitions unreasonable-application
Latest Conference:
2022-03-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether on ZaWwidual Cire Surge of the US. Ceork Of Ageeals Was ociainal Hebbeas Compus Worishidhoa over a second of Suceassve heloeas Pelion. Filed Loy a Skate prisoner use Was Unrable Seo olckata Weare £eonr Mp US Coun of Agpeals + o € le Q Second of succeseve pekion TO Khe. iddce Cork , Pekkan Foo Lm OF Maidens p>
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals was original habeas corpus jurisdiction over a second or successive habeas petition filed by a state prisoner who was unable to obtain leave from the U.S. Court of Appeals to file a second or successive petition
Docket Entries
2022-03-21
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-03-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2021-12-16
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 17, 2022)
Attorneys
Allen Calton
Allen F. Calton — Petitioner