No. 21-6879

In Re Allen Fitzgerald Calton

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2022-01-18
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: cause-and-prejudice constitutional-rights criminal-procedure evidence-review evidentiary-hearing habeas-corpus innocence innocence-claim life-sentence original-jurisdiction state-court-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether Petitioner Ao Me Sickack Court Lor hearing gursus nt PON Combs ocainal \qaloeas yursdicion Vo rarcanked fa AHS excephional Life serene case where Wre oahoner Inas coed Sulosrontial case of innate. Nek ao Shaky Oc CedSaral Coury lnas WelB an eviderhary Wearing Xo etamine Wis new evidens?

2. wWherer ycanker Ayo he Sastack COUN Sor nearing, Qursuan AD Une cours octlatnd hdeas gus chin Wo worked inthe exceevronal Life Sedona cose wthere Ye eehhnan Can esteVeli Cause! and Qreyudica! foo Laling 4m coke The claim ear Vier Mek ao shake oc federal Cour has held an eordeioyy \n BoM, HW eramine his aww S@nduw oF ceslue the Cock issues?

3. When Srake Courks have adopted Mn Cedeal Mscrriage of Yusdice excegkion og a grrdre ag Xhair On | in cegsluhony Of & logeq ert shake ongelfcalions -Wher @ gekbioner eve (dashes a grime Lacie. Snowing OL [ANoCANL 1A ARR Vleck y Coutts Oo ane Aig ohanicg ane d CAMS eal Claims Ceniested on ane mertks nate - Os Yaa Gedaral Gavoh accood dele — cence ons Mae ecesumpien of Cocreteness 4 those fin dinag MOSS WI MNe Shek? Courk undan -Weic Coums ere sent avd AEDPA?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether transfer to the Supreme Court for hearing pursuant to the court's original habeas jurisdiction is warranted in this exceptional life sentence case where the petitioner has made a substantial case of innocence, and no state or federal court has held an evidentiary hearing to examine the new evidence?

Docket Entries

2022-02-22
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-01-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-12-16
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

In Re Allen F. Calton
Allen F. Calton — Petitioner